Slush swells budget despite funds’ demise
Capitol News Bureau
Published: Jun 27, 2006
Story originally published in The Advocate


In the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, it was business as usual for the Legislature during the recent session, Barry Erwin, president of the Council for a Better Louisiana, said Monday.

In an interview, Erwin pointed to the more than $31 million in pet projects that legislators piled into the state budget for the upcoming fiscal year.   The $26.7 billion state government operating budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1 contains hundreds of local projects, ranging from road work to festivals.  In past years, the money would have come from the governor’s urban and rural development funds.

Gov. Kathleen Blanco got rid of the funds to cut down on costs after the hurricanes. Many applauded the move as government reform.  The criticism was that the money — normally about $15 million — only went to black legislators and to rural legislators in favor with the governor.  Administration officials insisted the urban and rural development funds would not be resurrected.

Months later, the funds are gone but the projects are not. They are scattered throughout the budget, listed as “Special Legislative Projects.”  Blanco can veto any project she does not like. However, she has not indicated that she will do so.
  

Jim Brandt with the Public Affairs Research Council said the projects now are even harder to track because they are “lodged and imbedded” in the budget. The price tag on the projects also has doubled since the governor got rid of the urban and rural funds, Brandt said.

“If ‘slush fund’ reform is going to continue, it’s going to have to be through the line-item veto,” Brandt said.  Erwin said it would have been better if the governor had applied pressure to keep the projects out of the budget from the beginning.
 
A lot of the projects, he said, are questionable at best.  Proponents for the projects argue they are essential for communities with limited resources.

“Special Legislative Projects” in the 2006-07 state operating budget


Story originally published in The Advocate